Home › 📝Posts › Volunteering Vulnerability

• Published: @Today
• Canonical: Read on site

• Volunteering Vulnerability
• Hands-On Volunteering in Freefall
• The Counter-Narrative: Online Volunteering Growth
• The Funding Crisis
• Infrastructure Collapse: The Paradox Amplified
• Why This Matters
• The Definition Sleight of Hand

Volunteering Vulnerability

Green spaces across the UK face a deceptive crisis. While headlines celebrate a "fourfold increase in online volunteering" through digital platforms, communities maintaining green spaces report a starkly different ground truth: trails are unmaintained, invasive species spread unchecked, and the hands needed to maintain these spaces are absent. Simultaneously, funding to fill this gap has evaporated. Together, these forces, declining hands-on volunteering and catastrophic funding cuts, create infrastructure collapse that online engagement cannot address.

This paradox reveals a fundamental transitional vulnerability: the volunteering landscape has shifted from place-based stewardship to screen-based engagement, precisely when communities most desperately need people on the ground maintaining green infrastructure.

Hands-On Volunteering in Freefall

The evidence for collapsing hands-on volunteering is unambiguous:

Scotland:

• Only 18% of Scottish adults formally volunteered in 2023, the lowest rate ever recorded
• Between 2019-2023, Scotland lost 335,000 formal volunteers
• 28 million fewer volunteer hours were contributed between 2018-2022
• Hobby-related volunteering (nature conservation, environmental groups) fell six percentage points (2022-2023), the largest decline of any sector
• 79% of third sector organisations report volunteer recruitment challenges

England:

• Formal volunteering fell from 27% (2013/14) to 16% (2023/24), the lowest recorded rate
• Any volunteering (monthly participation) dropped to 33% in 2023/24, the lowest since measurement began

For communities maintaining green spaces, you cannot do ground-level work, clearing trails, removing invasive species, maintaining habitat, through a screen. These declines directly translate to unmaintained spaces, deteriorating facilities, and lost environmental stewardship.

Why Hands-On Volunteering Is Collapsing:

Cost-of-living pressures cut off participation pathways. Leisure activities, the gateway to conservation volunteering, are being abandoned by 53% of Scottish adults. Working-age adults (who perform most physical maintenance) show the steepest volunteering declines. Those with mental health challenges, who most need the wellbeing benefits of volunteering, are least able to participate.

The Counter-Narrative: Online Volunteering Growth

A completely different narrative has emerged: Reach Volunteering reported a fourfold increase in sign-ups since the pandemic with 16,000 new registrations in 2024. Online searches for volunteer roles rose 13% across the UK year-to-February 2025.

But this growth is almost exclusively in remote, skills-based work: legal advice, business consulting, financial auditing, all done from home. Reach Volunteering's platform facilitates asynchronous, project-based micro-volunteering that demands flexibility but not physical presence.

The critical distinction: This online growth does not substitute for environmental stewardship. An accountant volunteering remotely to provide financial advice to a charity appears in statistics as volunteering growth. But no one is clearing invasive species from the woodland. No one is maintaining trails. No one is removing litter or mending fences.

Reach CEO Janet Thorne states: "We are not witnessing the death of volunteering; we are seeing a powerful shift." The question for communities maintaining green spaces is: does this shift serve ground-level stewardship or abandon it entirely?

The Funding Crisis

As volunteer labour collapses, funding support has evaporated:

Parks funding cuts:

• England: Parks funding down £330 million annually in real terms since 2010
• 48% of UK local authorities plan to defund parks and green spaces
• Liverpool cut parks spending by 72% over 10 years

Charity sector:

• 76% of charities experienced donation drops
• 51% using reserves to cover core costs, an unsustainable practice

Ironically, as volunteering collapses, the need for volunteer coordination increases—yet volunteer coordinators are the first positions eliminated during funding cuts. This creates catastrophic organisational failure: without coordinators, recruitment and retention of remaining volunteers becomes impossible.

Infrastructure Collapse: The Paradox Amplified

When hands-on volunteering decline and funding cuts converge, they don't add together—they multiply:

The Cascade:

1. Fewer volunteers + no funds → communities can't maintain spaces
2. Deterioration → loss of community attachment and pride
3. Lost attachment → even fewer willing to volunteer
4. Meanwhile, online volunteering statistics grow, suggesting volunteering is thriving
5. Policy-makers conclude support for ground-level stewardship is unnecessary
6. Spaces deteriorate faster while appearing to be supported by "growing volunteering"
7. Communities disinvest from spaces they no longer recognise or use
8. Governance collapses (volunteer trustees decline, Friends groups dissolve)
9. Paid staff cannot be hired (no funding) to fill the gap
10. Existential viability threshold crossed: management becomes impossible

Why This Matters

The Substitution Impossibility: Communities cannot substitute online volunteering for hands-on maintenance. A lawyer providing remote pro-bono advice does not fix a broken fence. A consultant writing a strategy document from home does not clear invasive species. Physical green space work cannot be done digitally.

The Equity Failure: Wealthy communities supplement municipal funding through private fundraising and affluent volunteers. Deprived communities face funding cuts while experiencing higher barriers to volunteering (cost-of-living pressures, precarious employment). Green space inequality accelerates.

The Democratic Deficit: Without volunteer trustees and governance, communities lose voice in green space decisions. Spaces become autocratic council assets rather than community places. Loss of voice means loss of attachment, accelerating decline.

The Definition Sleight of Hand

Traditional volunteering definition: Hands-on work for groups/organisations, regular time commitment, place-based participation, measurable embodied contribution.

Modern definition: Remote skills advice, asynchronous online tasks, episodic micro-volunteering, any contribution regardless of physical manifestation.

When surveys measure "formal volunteering" (traditional), they count declining numbers—correctly capturing the crisis. When digital platforms measure "volunteering" (modern), they count growing numbers—correctly capturing cultural shift. Neither is wrong, but together they create a false impression that volunteering is simultaneously declining and growing.

For communities maintaining green spaces, the implication is brutal: if policy-makers believe volunteering is growing, they conclude support for traditional volunteering is unnecessary—precisely when ground-level stewardship most desperately needs it.